Landasan Filosofis Pendidikan Akhlak Al-Ghazali dan Ibnu Miskawaih

Ach Nurholis Majid

Abstract


Recent facts state that there is a symptom of negative implications in education, there is a threat of social insecurity. These threats can be seen in immoral and immoral acts committed by school-age children and educated people. This condition is the result of the inability of the educational process in fostering the morals of the students. This moral education discourse has been widely discussed, but in a philosophical context it is necessary to refresh and explore ideas. In the context of Islamic education, the figures that can be appointed are well-known and credible Muslim figures. This article attempts to examine the philosophical foundational ideas proposed by Al-Ghazali and Ibn Miskawaih and their proposals related to ontology, epistemology, and axiology. Ibn Miskawaih and Al-Ghazali provide an understanding of morality as a mental condition that encourages a person to take an action spontaneously and consistently. Good morals, actualized in good behavior. On the other hand, bad morals will be actualized in bad behavior. Morals are indicators of a person's psyche. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Miskawaih agreed to propose a middle way. Although the terms are different. For Ibn Miskawaih, the middle way is a condition between the extreme left and the extreme right. Meanwhile, for Al-Ghazali, wasatiah is a condition of the soul that is in line with the Shari'a and reason. To achieve such conditions, training and habituation can be carried out, including efforts to approach God (Allah). The goal, said Ibn Miskawaih, so that someone can achieve as-sa'adah (happiness),


Keywords


Moral Education, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Miskawaih

References


Adian Husaini. “Sains Islam: Sarana Membentuk Manusia Beriman, Bertakwa, Dan Berakhlak Mulia.†InpasOnline.Com, May 12, 2014. Accessed October 30, 2020. https://inpasonline.com/sains-islam-sarana-membentuk-manusia-beriman-bertakwa-dan-berakhlak-mulia/.

Busroli, Ahmad. “Pendidikan akhlak Ibnu Miskawaih dan Imam al-Ghazali dan relevansinya dengan pendidikan karakter di Indonesia.†Atthulab: Islamic Religion Teaching and Learning Journal 4, no. 2 (November 21, 2019): 236–251.

Dalmeri. “PENDIDIKAN UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN KARAKTER (Telaah Terhadap Gagasan Thomas Lickona Dalam Educating for Character).†Al-Ulum Volume. 14, no. Nomor 1, (June 2014): 269–288.

al-Ghazali, Imam. Ringkasan Ihya’ Ulumuddin. Translated by ’Abdul Rosyad. Jakarta: Akbar Media, 2008.

Hamim, Nur. “Pendidikan Akhlak: Komparasi Konsep Pendidikan Ibnu Miskawaih dan al-Ghazali.†Ulumuna 18, no. 1 (November 8, 2017): 21–40.

Imam Abi Hamid Muhammad bin Muhammad Al-Ghazali. Ihya Ulumiddin. Beirut: Daru Ibnu Hazm, 2005.

Indrianto, Nino. Pendidikan Agama Islam Interdisipliner Untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2020.

Jamal, Syafa’atul. “Konsep Akhlak menurut Ibn Miskawaih.†Tasfiyah 1, no. 1 (February 1, 2017): 50.

Nata, Abuddin. Pemikiran Para Tokoh Pendidikan Islam. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2005.

Omar, Mohd. Nasir. Akhlak Dan Kaunseling Islam. Cheras: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd, 2005.

Prasetiya, Benny. “Dialektika Pendidikan Akhlak dalam Pandangan Ibnu Miskawaih dan Al-Gazali.†Intiqad: Jurnal Agama dan Pendidikan Islam 10, no. 2 (December 30, 2018): 249–267.

Rohayati, Enok. “PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI TENTANG PENDIDIKAN AKHLAK,†no. 01 (2011): 20.

Suryadarma, Yoke, and Ahmad Hifdzil Haq. “Pendidikan Akhlak Menurut Imam Al-Ghazali†10, no. 2 (2015).

Tantawi, Muhammad Sayyid. al-Aqidah wa al-Akhlaq. Mesir: Nahdlatu Misra, n.d.

Team, Almaany. “تعري٠و شرح Ùˆ معنى أخلاق بالعربي ÙÙŠ معاجم اللغة العربية معجم المعاني الجامع، المعجم الوسيط ،اللغة العربية المعاصرة ،الرائد ،لسان العرب ،القاموس المحيط - معجم عربي عربي صÙحة 1.†Accessed October 30, 2020. https://www.almaany.com/ar/dict/ar-ar/%D8%A3%D8%AE%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82/.

Wathoni, Lalu Muhammad Nurul. Akhlak Tasawuf: Menyelami Kesucian Diri. Lombok: Forum Pemuda Aswaja, 2020.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28944/fakta.v2i1.697

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.